Georgia passed new legislation allowing more relaxed gun restrictions in the http://www.ramonginer.com/comprar-levitra-sin-receta/ past two weeks. Not only is it causing major controversy, but it’s making individuals question if it’s a smart move for children. Continue reading
This past week at the Public Square, the not so far fetch concept of universally free internet was discussed among our debaters. With ever growing technology at the tip of societies fingers and a portable computer the size of ones hand, it’s impossible not to consider the internet in this day in age as an utter necessity. However, when you boil down to the fundamentals of human rights, does internet fit?
Joining us on the issue was Derek Pugh from Campaign for America’s Future and Nick Morpus from Liberty Minds. Both individuals made valid arguments on the issue, presenting both sides of the coin.
“In this day in age the Internet is becoming essential. It is almost required for everything. We have the capacity to provide it to our citizens, it would increase productivity, we should do it,” Pugh said.
Morpus immediately jumped in with the statement that Internet is an industry and a business like any other. If provided for free, how would it actually contribute to the productivity of society?
“I do not believe we actually have the means to provide something like this for free. We are well over 17 trillion dollars in debt. That’s 17 trillion dollars of obligations we need to fill down the road. Someone is going to have to pay for this and right now I don’t see it as being a possibility,” Morpus said.
James Hedrick a PhD candidate for Rice University sided with Morpus declaring the idea of free universal internet a irrational and unreasonable proposal.
Share your thoughts on this topic in the comments below and tell us what you want to see featured on the Public Square by visiting our Facebook and http://www.plaza-aminta.com/cialis-south-carolina/ Twitter pages.
Watch the show at 6:30 p.m. Eastern time.
Submit a question to our guests.
The biggest story this week was the Supreme Court case involving affirmative action. The court let stand a Michigan ballot initiative that prohibits public universities in the state from using race as a factor in their admission practices. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote, “This case is not about how the debate about racial preferences should be resolved. It is about who may resolve it.” Justice Sonia Sotomayor took the unusual step of reading her opinion from the bench, saying, “We ought not sit back and wish away, rather than confront, the racial inequality that exists in our society.” Who’s right here? Continue reading
Our first topic is the ongoing situation in Ukraine. This week, armed pro-Russian militia took control of several government buildings in eastern Ukraine, which Ukraine later took back. But it seems clear that Moscow is behind this latest aggression. Clearly, the sanctions imposed after Russia’s invasion of Crimea have not kept Vladimir Putin at bay. So what do we do now? Continue reading
This week marked “Equal Pay Day,” and Congress celebrated by considering and rejecting the Paycheck Fairness Act, which would have addressed the so-called gender wage gap–the difference in average pay between men and women. Is the gender wage gap due to bias against women, or are there other explanations?
President Obama also took action on the gender pay gap, signing two executive orders, one of which bars federal contractors from punishing employees who discuss their pay with each other. Now, apart from the gender pay issue, is it smart to let workers discuss compensation with each other? Could it lead to discord in the workplace?
Also this week, former Florida governor and possible Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush caused controversy by calling illegal immigration an “act of love” on the part of the immigrants trying to support their families. Border hawks criticized the remark, saying that breaking immigration law is not an act of love. Is Bush right or wrong?
Finally, we witnessed this week yet another instance of mass violence in America when a teenager went on a stabbing rampage in a Pennsylvania high school. It came less than a week after a soldier opened fire at Fort Hood, Texas. This kind of scene has become all too familiar in the United States. Why are such incidents more common here in America, and what, if anything, can be done about them?
Democratic consultant Mathews Pierson, conservative activist Fredrick Mckinley, and Nick Brana (formerly of the Terry McAuliffe campaign) debate these issues.
First up this week is the big decision from the Supreme Court. In McCutcheon vs. FEC, the court struck down limits on the amounts individuals may donate each cycle to candidates, parties, and political action committees, although it left in place limits for individuals to specific candidates. Critics of the decision claim that it’s the death knell for democracy in America, but defenders say it upholds free speech.
The biggest story this week was the high-profile case at the Supreme Court that pitted women’s access to contraception against the religious rights of business owners. The owners of arts-and-crafts chain Hobby Lobby have petitioned for an exemption from Obamacare’s mandate to provide contraception because of the owners’ religious beliefs. The government argues that for-profit corporations have no right to restrict their employees’ access to birth control. Which party is being wronged? Continue reading
A funny cartoon from AlterNet:
The Square Circle will be discussing the ongoing situation involving Russia and Ukraine. Russia annexed Crimea this week over the protests of America and the West. President Obama’s options are limited, and countries like China, Iran, and North Korea are surely watching closely how the U.S. reacts to Russian aggression. What does this episode portend for U.S. foreign policy over the rest of Obama’s term? Continue reading
We’d like to request your help. We’re having trouble coming up with topics for The Square Circle this week.
It’s a rather slow news week. Obviously, there’s the ongoing story of the missing Malaysian jetliner, but there’s no real policy angle on it. There’s the situation in Crimea, but we’ve discussed it on the last two shows.
Some other possiblities:
If you have any suggestions, please post them on our Facebook page.