Donald Sterling, capital punishment, Benghazi

Watch the show.

The big story this week was the rapid fall of http://casinopaquito.com/levitra-online-kaufen/ Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling. On Tuesday, NBA commissioner Adam Silver announced that he would ban Sterling from the http://signoracci.com/kamagra-senza-ricetta-spagna/ NBA for life, fine him $2.5 million, and lobby for the sale of the team. Now everyone agrees that Sterling’s racist views are abhorrent, but some worry about overreaction. For instance, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban said this week, “If it’s about racism and scottcooperryan.com cheap viagra pharmacy we’re ready to kick people out of the league, OK? Then what about homophobia? What about somebody who doesn’t like a particular religion? What about somebody who’s anti-Semitic? What about a xenophobe? In this country, people are allowed to be morons.” So does the punishment fit the crime, or is Cuban right that we’re headed down a slippery slope?

Staying on the subject of the Sterling situation, one aspect that has not gotten much attention is the fact that Sterling’s remarks were recorded without his knowledge or consent. Some commentators have pointed out that, given that the http://awpwatersystems.com/usa-order-levitra/ NSA data collection program is so controversial, shouldn’t we be more concerned about supposedly private conversations being made public?

Another story making headlines this week comes from Oklahoma, where the state executed a man, but not before he suffered a seizure due to a new lethal injection formula. Some have said that this episode should renew a debate on what methods of execution constitute cruel and unusual punishment. What, if anything, does this case say about the death penalty?

Finally, new documents about the Benghazi scandal surfaced this week, and some have called them a smoking gun. In the e-mails, which were obtained by a court order, White House officials order alterations of messaging strategy, attempting to blame a Youtube video for sparking the attack in order to protect President Obama from political criticism. Are these documents a smoking gun? More broadly, is the Benghazi story still relevant a year and a half after the attack?

Journalist Gregory Clay, Scott Greer of The Daily Caller, and conservative activist Fredrick Mckinley discuss these issues.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail